Please declare your traffic by updating your user agent to include company specific information.įor best practices on efficiently downloading information from SEC.gov, including the latest EDGAR filings, visit sec.gov/developer. Your request has been identified as part of a network of automated tools outside of the acceptable policy and will be managed until action is taken to declare your traffic. To allow for equitable access to all users, SEC reserves the right to limit requests originating from undeclared automated tools. Someday I'll just set aside a bunch of time and download ORTS and get it installed, and it won't ever be a problem for ME again.Your Request Originates from an Undeclared Automated Tool So spending my time download "BAD" content that won't work on MSTS, is extremely annoying.
If I want to use that content, well, I know that I need to use ORTS! AND ORTS is supposed to use MSTS content too! So.really.That's all good.īut, as a creator myself trying to please the MSTS crowd, and as someone who is forced to use Slow DialUp, I have not gotten around to finding the time to download and installing ORTS Yet.
I have no problems with ORTS Only! content, that is to be expected, and is going to get more and more common every day. These two things only take a few second to do! You can load these up in Shape Viewer, and select the "Hierarchy" option to see if you have subgroups. If you design a freight animation with subgroups.Then it is not MSTS compatible. Freight Animations designed with subgroups won't properly load in MSTS. You know how many polys your creations have, check the charts! This limit is fairly well known by many and I think can be found in several threads in the forums. MSTS has limits on the number of polys that can be loaded. To make things worse, TWO of the biggest things on the checking for compatibility, don't even require loading creations into the MSTS SIM ENGINE, that some creators don't even have installed anymore! Well then, don't advertise it as being MSTS compatible! Then they'll say it has NOT been tested in MSTS. What get me fuming, is that some creators are still passing off their content as being MSTS Compatible, when it isn't. Now, if ORTS content CAN also be compatible with MSTS, then I see no reason why, creators can make it to do that too, but it is up to the creator to make that decision. We all know that ORTS is replacing MSTS, and ORTS allows for more detailed content that MSTS does NOT support. I don't understand why people are upset about ORTS Only content.
0 kommentar(er)
